Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  339 / 352 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 339 / 352 Next Page
Page Background

335

ration about its validity should be necessary. First of all is how to define crack and its tip

at nano level. It is visible in Fig. 1 that CNT is about 1.3 nm wide, the value not clearly

contained in Fig. 13. Eventual defects are, of course, of lower size. It is difficult to find

exact position for defects at nanoscale in Fig. 1.

It is clear that further consideration of structural integrity and reliability of nano mate-

rial and eventual defects in it is necessary. This should include not only the state of stress

and strain around defect boundary, but also many fundamental notions, such as strength

and deformation parameters and properties.

4. NANO MATERALS AND THEIR FRACTURE PROPERTIES

The development of nano materials is impressive, what is confirmed by the number of

published papers devoted to performed research and achieved application, overpassing

2000 till the year 2006 /1/, extended eventually by exponential law. Today a spectrum of

nano materials is available for different applications, exhibiting different properties.

First nano material obtained in controlled manufacturing in year 1991, carbon nano

tube (CNT), attracted an enormous interest for the application in production of elec-

tronics and mechanics components. Single and multi wall CNT are accepted as super

strong and stiff carbon fibres in developing new generation of composite materials.

Monolayer of carbon atoms (graphene) and carbon nano tube are presented in Fig. 15 /1/.

A cylindrical single layer of graphene or single-wall nanotubes (SWNT) represents the

most elementary CNT. In cylindrical configuration the properties of graphene are

conserved, especially those concerning the electrical and mechanical properties. A

SWNT has the diameter of an order of 1-2 nm, capped with ends of, usually six,

pentagonal cells. In this uniform arrangement of atoms the strength of structure is close

to ideal since the full capacity of atomic bonds is seized. It reflects to fracture strength as

well. As an illustrative comparison of modulus of elasticity and fracture properties of

different materials are given in Table 2. The values in Table 2 should be taken only as

informative, since the conditions for their determination can be very different. This

should have in mind when the data given in Table 2 are used and compared /1/. In

graphite, each carbon atom in a basal plane of compact packed hexagonal cell is strongly

bonded (covalent sp2) to the three neighbouring atoms while adjacent basal planes are

bonded by weak van der Waals forces (π bond). For that, the elastic modulus of the

graphite in the basal plane is very high while the strength of the graphite perpendicular

on the basal planes is comparatively poor. In curved graphene sheets of CNT, the bonds

are not purely of sp2 or π type, but an admixture, hence, variation in mechanical

properties may be a result.

Typical

nano materials

are ranged from 1 do 100 nm in size, Fig. 15d. The area to

volume ratio is much higher than at micro and macro level. In addition to quantum

effect, expressed already for several nm, this contributes to unexpected useful properties

of nano materials. Nano crystalline materials are of extremely high strength and

hardness, but they can also be very ductile and tough, resistant to fatigue, creep, erosion

and corrosion, combined with high degree of electrical and thermal conductivity.

To use the benefits of obtained nano structures properties some comparison with

macro scaled structures should be done.

Design, manufacturing and exploitation of structures on macro scale are all based on

stress and strain parameters, comparing materials properties and corresponding values