Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  82 / 352 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 82 / 352 Next Page
Page Background

78

Figure 7: Distribution of void volume fraction

f

near the crack tip at the crack growth initiation

The influence of the finite element size, formulation and integration order on the

results of the crack growth initiation analysis on SENB specimen is considered in this

section. In addition to the adopted FE size 0.15x0.15 mm (corresponding to the mean free

path between the inclusions in WM, according to /15, 25/), two other FE sizes are

considered: 0.3x0.3 mm and 0.075x0.075 mm. The results obtained in /39/ using these

sizes of 8-noded elements with reduced (2x2) integration are given in Fig. 8. CTOD value

at the crack growth initiation (CTOD

i

) is determined when damage parameter

f

reaches

critical value

f

c

at the integration point nearest to the crack tip, see /15, 40/. Nucleation of

the secondary voids is not taken into account here, but will be analysed later on.

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

Exp.

CGM, FE 0.075x0.075 mm

CGM, FE 0.15x0.15 mm

CGM, FE 0.3x0.3 mm

2

H

[mm]

CTOD

i

[mm]

18

12

6

Figure 8: The influence of element size on the CTOD

i

values, 8-noded FE with reduced integration

Calculation with FE size 0.3x0.3 mm gives higher material resistance than the real

one, while the opposite is obtained with FE size 0.075x0.075 mm. It is clear that FE size

similar to the mean free path between the inclusions is the most suitable in this case.

Besides the FE size ahead the crack tip, formulation of the element and the integration

order should also be taken into account. The results obtained using various elements with

dimensions 0.15x0.15 mm (Fig. 9) imply that the integration order has a strong influence

on predicted CTOD

i

values. The use of 8-noded elements with full integration leads to

much smaller values, which are very close to those obtained with 8-noded elements with