Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 352 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 352 Next Page
Page Background

41

Figure 23. Different interpretation of

material yielding law based on tension data

Figure 24. Hardening parameter effect (linear

behaviour

n = 1, ideal plastic material

n =

)

There exist different methods for the construction of this diagram, but here we want to

use for the presentation one of the simplest that is developed and verified for the design

of the ARIANE 5 Booster case by author. Since the majority of other FAD construction

methods is also less accurate, it is very reasonable to use this simple

and robust

method.

Abscissa of the FAD represents the plasticity effect. To this end the ordinate is given

as the ratio between actual nominal load

σ

and nominal load at the yielding level

σ

Y

r

Y

L

σ

σ

=

(36)

FAD ordinate is a measure of proximity to LEFM failure due to crack driving force

depending on plasticity level (

L

r

). Based on (22) this can be estimated by the relationship

(

)

r

e pl

K

E

σ

σ

ε

ε

=

+

(37)

It should be mentioned that designation with

K

r

should be not confused with the stress

intensity factor, because

K

r

is dimensionless value and represents factor of relative

reduction of critical fracture resistance characteristics (

K

Ic

,

J

Ic

,

δ

Ic

, K

R

) for given

L

r

value.

It follows after substitution from (36)

σ

= L

r

σ

Y

and material curve

σ

= B

Δε

pl

n

1/

r Y

r

n

r Y

r Y

L

K

L

L

E

E

B

σ

σ

σ

=

+ ⎢

(38)

Based on this solution corresponding FAD curve is designed in Fig. 25. Up to the

stress increase to about 70 % of yield stress the material resistance to fracture is not

changed, and after that there it is significantly reduced based on net section yielding.

Failure assessment diagram has been firstly proposed from Central Electricity

Generating Board (CEGB) in Great Britain, based on which the known R-6 method was

developed. From first publishing 1976 it passed different improvements and revisions and

today is well developed and include data necessary for practical application. However,

the results of calculation based on R-6 can be sometimes inadmissible conservative.