288 / 352
284
properties and fracture toughness. Output rutine enables print and safe results as report or
plots and text file appropriate for further analysis.
REFERENCES
1.
T. Valh, Preračun celovitosti konstrukcijskih komponent z računalniškim programom po
SINTAP postopku, Diplomsko delo, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za strojništvo, Maribor,
2004
2.
U. Zerbst, C. Wiesner, M. Koçak, L. Hodulak, SINTAP: Entwurf einer vereinheitlichen
europäischen
Fehlerbewurtungsprozedur-eine
Einführung,
GKSS-Forschungszentrum
Geesthacht GmbH, Geesthacht, 1999
3.
K.-H. Schwalbe, U. Zerbst, Y.-J. Kim, W. Brocks, A. Cornec, J. Heerens, H. Amstutz, EFAM
ETM 97-the ETM method for assessing the significance of the crack-like defects in
engineering structures, comprising the versions ETM 97/1 and ETM 97/2, GKSS-
Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Geesthacht, 1998
4.
K.-H. Schwalbe, Y.-J. Kim, S. Hao, A. Cornec, M. Koçak, EFAM ETM-MM 96-the ETM
method for assessing the significance of the crack-like defects in joints with mechanical
heterogeneity (strength mismatch), GKSS-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Geesthacht,
1997
5.
N. Gubeljak, Celovitost konstrukcij, Znanstvena monografija, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta
za strojništvo, Maribor, 2006
6.
N. Gubeljak, Mehanika loma, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za strojništvo, Maribor, 2009
7.
7. Neale B.K., On the best fit curve through crack growth fracture resistance data, Fatigue
Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct, 16(4), 465-472.