Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  189 / 352 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 352 Next Page
Page Background

185

Figure 10: Fracture surface of the specimen in the tilt stage on scanning electron microscope

Visual examination of the highly magnified specimen, Fig. 11, gives the impression that

the stretch zone was uniform in the specimen midthickness. However, after measuring the

stretch-zone dimensions

w

and

t

, as discussed, it was obvious that the magnitude of these

values, as well as the magnitude of

h

, vary across the crack front. A typical variation of

w

,

t

,

and

h

across the specimen thickness is shown in Fig. 12. Although the stretch zone appears

uniform macroscopically, the variation in local microstructure and alteration in local

deformation characteristics as the crack tip blunts leads to differences in

w

and

t

values and

hence, in the magnitude of

h

.

The experimental measurements /10/ were made on high strength Mo-Nb micro-

alloyed steel NIOMOL, with 0.06% C (Fig. 13). The investigation was carried out on a

welded joint, and the results presented here are the measurements made on 10 mm wide

samples from the heat-affected-zone (HAZ). Seven fractographs were made by SEM,

which were then used to measure the width and the depth of the stretch zone/11/. Five

measurements were made per each fractographs, using Texture Analysis System, i.e. TAS

plus. Typical variation in the measured

w

,

t

and

h

in performed experiments is presented

in Fig. 14.

6.2. Fracture toughness obtained measuring stretch zone width and depth

The method for obtaining the J integral by measuring the stretch-zone width (SZW) is

based on the fact that SZW is equivalent to the critical virtual crack extension (

Δ

a

cr

) prior

to the onset of ductile tearing, a vertical line drawn at

Δ

a

= SZW. The J corresponding to

the intersection of this vertical line with the J-resistance curve is taken as

J

SZW

, Fig. 15.

For determination of J from the SZD, two methods were used.

In the first method, the CTOD calculated as per standard, was plotted against

Δ

a

, and

a line at

δ

= 2SZD is drawn to intersect the

δ

-

Δ

a

curve. The

Δ

a

value corresponding to

the intersection was labelled

Δ

a

cr

. The intersection of

Δ

a

cr

on the corresponding J-

Δ

a

curve is labelled

J

SZD

, Fig. 16.a. In the second method, the J -

δ

data are plotted, and a

vertical at

δ

= 2SZD is drawn. Intersection on J -

δ

curve is labelled

J

SZD

, Fig. 16.b.