Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  230 / 352 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 230 / 352 Next Page
Page Background

226

freedom or change of material. Several procedures for the dynamic reanalysis of

structures concern the changes encountered by the dynamic properties of the structures

when a modification is involved. Usually, the dynamic properties under consideration are

the modal parameters, and for that several studies have been addressed to the modal

reanalysis of linear structures. The perturbation approach has been utilized by Inamura /1/

and by Ki /2/ for the evaluation of the approximate eigen properties of the modified

structural system. Rayleigh’s method has been utilized by Wang and Pilkey /3/ and

Hodges /4/ for the evaluation of the approximate eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the

modified structure, taking into account the results of the initial modal analysis of the

original structure. Nair, Keane and Langley /5/ proposed a method to improve first-order

approximation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The reanalysis problems attract the

attention recently, and many papers are devoted to this topic /6-28/.

The main goal of dynamic reanalysis is to provide numerical procedures to evaluate

the structural response after modifications of design variables. The general problem of

dynamic reanalysis is presented in Fig. 2 and consists of three important aspects.

Figure 2: Triangle of dynamic reanalysis

The aim of this presentation is to show how the change of support conditions can

improve dynamic characteristics of a structure. Structural model is the most important

prerequisite for this analysis, because the distribution of potential and kinetic energy in

every finite element (FE) of model is necessary for the evaluation of reanalysis success.

Appropriate finite element or analytical model of mechanical structure is important for

the successful structural integrity analysis. In practice, a high degree of confidence can be

achieved with such an analytical FE model when its dynamic response is confirmed by an

experimental analysis. However, updating the FE model or identifying the analytical

model directly is usually not the main objective of structural vibration analysis because

there are many situations when the dynamic response of the mechanical structure does not

satisfy the requirement specified by the structural analyst (designer). In such situations,

the dynamic response of the mechanical structure has to be altered either by controlling

the input data to the structure, or by changing the dynamic characteristics of the structure.

The accepted inputs often result from interaction between the structure and environment

and for that can’t be easily controlled. When this is the case, the ability to alter the

structural response by redesigning the dynamic characteristics of the structure is of prime

significance. The use of structural reanalysis techniques to obtain the optimum condition

of FE model of a mechanical structure has been extended considerably in recent years.