Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  60 / 352 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 352 Next Page
Page Background

56

Figure 4: The thin sheet with groove of Marciniak and Kuczynski /22/

Assumptions

A4-1. For the plane sheet specimen considered (Fig. 4) an initial geometric imperfec-

tion given by two symmetric very shallow grooves

1 െ

ݐ

ݐ

ا

1 ⁄

is assumed. More-

over, a plane tension is considered such that one of principal stresses is along the groove

whereas, the other is perpendicular to it such that stress state is close to equibiaxial

(i.e.

ߪ

ߪ

൐ ሺ

ߪ

2⁄ ሻ ൐ 0, ߬

ଵଶ

ൌ ߬

ଶଷ

ൌ ߬

ଷଵ

ൌ 0

).

A4-2. Rigid rate independent plasticity of transversely isotropic material (its direction

being normal to the sheet) is accepted with evolution equations

݀

ߝ

ൌ ሾሺܴ ൅ 1ሻ

ߪ

െ ܴ

ߪ

ሿ݀

d

ߝ

ሾെܴ

ߪ

൅ ሺܴ ൅ 1ሻ

ߪ

ሿ݀

݀

ߝ

ൌ െሺ

ߪ

ߪ

ሻ݀

ߣ

(52)

originating by the associate flow rule from the following yield function

2݂ ؝ 2 3

ߪ

݄ሺ

ߝ

ҧሻ ൌ 1

(53)

where

݄ሺ

ߝ

ҧሻ

is hardening function. Here equivalent stress and equivalent strain increment

are respectively given by

ߪ

ത ൌ √3 √2 1 √2 ൅ ܴ ሼሺܴ ൅ 1ሻሺ

ߪ

ଵଶ

ߪ

ଶଶ

ሻ െ 2ܴ

ߪ

ߪ

భ మ

(54)

݀

ߝ

ҧ ൌ √2 √3 ඨ 2 ൅ ܴ 1 ൅ 2ܴ ሼ݀

ߝ

ଵଶ

൅ ݀

ߝ

ଶଶ

൅ ܴ ݀

ߝ

ଷଶ

భ మ

(55)

which follow from Korhonen's expressions assuming that

R

1

=

R

2

=

R

. Their product

amounts to the infinitesimal increment of plastic work, i.e.

݀

ߝ

ҧ ؔ ݀መ ܹ

ߪ

ത ൎ ݀

ߝ

ҧ

(56)

The two formulae (54) and (55), are also derived directly from the book of Hill /28/

(chapter on

anisotropic plasticity) with the yielding anisotropy parameter

ܴ ൌ 2

ߪ

ߪ

െ 1

(57)

(

ߪ

ߪ

ߪ

are uniaxial yield stresses in indicated directions). Apart from a

typographic mistake in

݀

ߝ

ҧ

(where on RHS in M-K they have

ߝ

ଵଶ

൅ ݀

ߝ

ଶଶ

൅ ݀

ߝ

ଷଶ

), constants

in

ߪ

and

݀

ߝ

ҧ

are slightly different here, but it does not influence the final results.